jump_test
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
jump_test [2019/07/12 11:32] – trynke | jump_test [2025/02/05 13:49] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The Jump Test is a method to measure lower-limb muscle power, as well as coordination of lower and upper extremities, | The Jump Test is a method to measure lower-limb muscle power, as well as coordination of lower and upper extremities, | ||
- | The Jump Test was performed in all able participants aged 8 years and older during [[2A Visit 1]]. | + | The Jump Test was performed in 32, |
==== Protocol ==== | ==== Protocol ==== | ||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=== Contra-indications === | === Contra-indications === | ||
- | Participants could not participant | + | Participants could not participate |
* Recent eye surgery (< 6 weeks) | * Recent eye surgery (< 6 weeks) | ||
* Recent thoracic-/ | * Recent thoracic-/ | ||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
* Aneurysm | * Aneurysm | ||
- | No strenuous exercise for other reasons: | + | ... or if they should not perform any strenuous exercise for other reasons: |
* Severe rheumatoid arthritis or osteoporosis | * Severe rheumatoid arthritis or osteoporosis | ||
* History of vertebral fractures | * History of vertebral fractures | ||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
=== Validation === | === Validation === | ||
- | The gold standard for measuring countermovement jumps is with a force platform. The Chronojump was validated against a force platform in thirty recreationally active adults ((Stanton R, Doering TM, Macgregor C, Borges N, Delvecchio L. Validity of a contact mat and accelerometric system to assess countermovement jump from flight time. Measurement in physical eduation and exercise science. 2018)).\\ | + | The gold standard for measuring countermovement jumps is with a force platform. The Chronojump was validated against a regular |
The Bland-Altman plot showed that Chronojump underestimated countermovement height by 5.46 cm. Previously it was shown that reliability was greater for participants more accustomed ot strength training. | The Bland-Altman plot showed that Chronojump underestimated countermovement height by 5.46 cm. Previously it was shown that reliability was greater for participants more accustomed ot strength training. | ||
- | === Rationale === | + | === Rationale |
Mechanography measures muscle power and peak-force, evaluates coordination and muscular function, and characterizes the muscle-bone relation.\\ | Mechanography measures muscle power and peak-force, evaluates coordination and muscular function, and characterizes the muscle-bone relation.\\ | ||
Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
The following variables were collected during the Jump Test: | The following variables were collected during the Jump Test: | ||
- | | **Questions | + | | **English** |
- | | Physician assistant has supported the participant during the measurement? | Is er ondersteuning geweest bij de metingen? | + | | jump test measured |
- | | Time of flight 1 (s) | + | | if not, reason: / jump test measured |
- | | Time of flight 2 (s) | + | | time of flight 1 (s) | vluchttijd |
- | | Time of flight 3 (s) | + | | time of flight 2 (s) | vluchttijd |
+ | | time of flight 3 (s) | vluchttijd | ||
jump_test.1562931155.txt.gz · Last modified: (external edit)