upf_categorization
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
upf_categorization [2022/11/23 10:56] laura [Table] |
upf_categorization [2025/02/05 14:49] (current) |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| Researchers from the [[https://www.rug.nl/staff/m.duan/|University Medical Center Groningen]] developed the Ultra-processed food (UPF) categorization for adults according to the NOVA classification using the [[ffq_sum_scores|Food Frequency Questionnaire Sum scores]] from the heart of the FFQ flower ([[1a_questionnaire_2|1A Questionnaire 2]]). ([[sections]]: [[Nutrition]] and [[secondary & linked variables]]).\\ | Researchers from the [[https://www.rug.nl/staff/m.duan/|University Medical Center Groningen]] developed the Ultra-processed food (UPF) categorization for adults according to the NOVA classification using the [[ffq_sum_scores|Food Frequency Questionnaire Sum scores]] from the heart of the FFQ flower ([[1a_questionnaire_2|1A Questionnaire 2]]). ([[sections]]: [[Nutrition]] and [[secondary & linked variables]]).\\ | ||
| - | The UPF food categorization can be requested in the Lifelines catalogue or by mail (data@lifelines.nl). When this data has been used in your research, you will have to include a reference to the the following paper: | + | The UPF food categorization can be requested in the [[https://data-catalogue.lifelines.nl/|Lifelines catalogue]]. When this data has been used in your research, you will have to include a reference to the the following paper: |
| * [[https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-021-02200-4|Duan, M. J., Vinke, P. C., Navis, G., Corpeleijn, E., & Dekker, L. H. (2022). Ultra-processed food and incident type 2 diabetes: studying the underlying consumption patterns to unravel the health effects of this heterogeneous food category in the prospective Lifelines cohort. BMC medicine, 20(1), 1-11.]] | * [[https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-021-02200-4|Duan, M. J., Vinke, P. C., Navis, G., Corpeleijn, E., & Dekker, L. H. (2022). Ultra-processed food and incident type 2 diabetes: studying the underlying consumption patterns to unravel the health effects of this heterogeneous food category in the prospective Lifelines cohort. BMC medicine, 20(1), 1-11.]] | ||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
| ===== Variables ===== | ===== Variables ===== | ||
| - | | **Questions English** | **Questions Dutch** | **Code** | **Variable** | **Assessment** | **Age** | | + | | **Label English** | **Label Dutch** | **Code** | **Variable** | **Assessment** | **Age** | |
| | food intake (gram per day) / NOVA classification 1: unprocessed or minimally processed food | voedselinname (gram per dag) / NOVA classificatie 1: onbewerkte of minimaal bewerkte voeding | nova_foodintake_adu_c_1 | nova1 | sec * | 18+ | | | food intake (gram per day) / NOVA classification 1: unprocessed or minimally processed food | voedselinname (gram per dag) / NOVA classificatie 1: onbewerkte of minimaal bewerkte voeding | nova_foodintake_adu_c_1 | nova1 | sec * | 18+ | | ||
| | food intake (gram per day) / NOVA classification 2: processed culinary ingredient | voedselinname (gram per dag) / NOVA classificatie 2: bewerkt culinair ingrediënt | nova_foodintake_adu_c_2 | nova2 | sec * | 18+ | | | food intake (gram per day) / NOVA classification 2: processed culinary ingredient | voedselinname (gram per dag) / NOVA classificatie 2: bewerkt culinair ingrediënt | nova_foodintake_adu_c_2 | nova2 | sec * | 18+ | | ||
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
| | reliability of the ffq heart results that were used to determine the nove scores | betrouwbaarheid van de ffq hart resultaten die zijn gebruikt voor het bepalen van de nova scores | nova_reliabilityffq_adu_c_1 | Betrouwbaarheid__nova | sec * | 18+ | | | reliability of the ffq heart results that were used to determine the nove scores | betrouwbaarheid van de ffq hart resultaten die zijn gebruikt voor het bepalen van de nova scores | nova_reliabilityffq_adu_c_1 | Betrouwbaarheid__nova | sec * | 18+ | | ||
| + | * The UPF categorization according to the NOVA is included as assessment 'sec' because it is based on the FFQ sum scores. | ||
upf_categorization.1669197378.txt.gz · Last modified: 2025/02/05 14:49 (external edit)
Page Tools
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International
