Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- leaq [2025/12/15 11:58] – created petra_vinke
+++ leaq [2025/12/15 12:00] (current) – [Protocol & response] petra_vinke
@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
-This additional study is conducted by the same University of Groningen research team that designed the additional study [[Language and Music (MUSQ)]] that was sent out to elderly participants (65+) in 2020. The researchers aim to expand the language data by asking all adult participants about their language use and language experiences.
+This additional study is conducted by the same University of Groningen research team that designed the additional study [[musq|Language and Music (MUSQ)]] that was sent out to elderly participants (65+) in 2020. The researchers aim to expand the language data by asking all adult participants about their language use and language experiences.
 The aim of the digital questionnaire is to investigate the effect of using multiple languages on cognitive performance throughout the Lifespan on a large scale, while taking into account other lifestyle factors known to modulate cognition (such as socioeconomic status, physical activity and diet) and genetic risk factors for age-related diseases such as Alzheimer's. This additional dataset can contribute to further research into how multilingualism contributes to healthy aging.
@@ Line 21: / Line 21: @@
 The Language Experience and Aging Questionnaire is based on the following questionnaires and papers:
-●	Pot, A., Keijzer, M. & de Bot, K. (2018). Intensity of Multilingual Language Use predicts Cognitive Performance in Some Multilingual Older Adults. Brain Sciences, 8(5), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci8050092
+  * Pot, A., Keijzer, M. & de Bot, K. (2018). Intensity of Multilingual Language Use predicts Cognitive Performance in Some Multilingual Older Adults. Brain Sciences, 8(5), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci8050092
-●	Gullifer, J.W., & Titone, D. (2020). Characterizing the social diversity of bilingualism using language entropy. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23(2), 283-294. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728919000026
+  * Gullifer, J.W., & Titone, D. (2020). Characterizing the social diversity of bilingualism using language entropy. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23(2), 283-294. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728919000026
-●	Kałamała, P., Szewczyk, J., Chuderski, A., Senderecka, M. & Wodniecka, Z. (2020). Patterns of bilingual language use and response inhibition: A test of the adaptive control hypothesis. Cognition, 204, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104373.
+  * Kałamała, P., Szewczyk, J., Chuderski, A., Senderecka, M. & Wodniecka, Z. (2020). Patterns of bilingual language use and response inhibition: A test of the adaptive control hypothesis. Cognition, 204, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104373.
-●	Hartanto, A. & Yang, H. (2016). Disparate bilingual experiences modulate task-switching advantages: A diffusion-model analysis of the effects of interactional context on switch costs. Cognition. 150, 10-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.01.016.
+  * Hartanto, A. & Yang, H. (2016). Disparate bilingual experiences modulate task-switching advantages: A diffusion-model analysis of the effects of interactional context on switch costs. Cognition. 150, 10-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.01.016.
-●	Tomić, A., Rodina, Y., Bayram, F. & de Cat, C. (2023). Documenting heritage language experience using questionnaires. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1131374.
+  * Tomić, A., Rodina, Y., Bayram, F. & de Cat, C. (2023). Documenting heritage language experience using questionnaires. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1131374.