ffq_sum_scores
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
ffq_sum_scores [2021/07/29 14:23] – [Remarkts from WUR researchers] laura | ffq_sum_scores [2025/02/05 13:49] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Researchers from [[https:// | Researchers from [[https:// | ||
+ | Using the FFQ Sum scores from [[1A]], an [[upf_categorization|ultra-processed food categorization]] has been generated and is available for use as well. | ||
- | The FFQ sum scores can be requested in the Lifelines catalogue or by email (data@lifelines.nl). When this data has been used in your research, you will have to include a reference to the following paper: \\ | + | The FFQ sum scores can be requested in the [[https://data-catalogue.lifelines.nl/|Lifelines catalogue]]. When this data has been used in your research, you will have to include a reference to the following paper: \\ |
* [[https:// | * [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | Optional paper for complete FFQ questionnaire: | ||
+ | * [[https:// | ||
\\ | \\ | ||
Line 10: | Line 14: | ||
A Food Frequency Questionnaire consists of a foodlist with a frequency response section for subjects to report how often each item was consumed over a specified period of time (in this case: one month). Data collection is therefore retrospective. From the answers given in a FFQ, nutrient intake can be estimated by calculations made with computerized software programs that multiply the reported frequency of each food item by the amount of nutrient in a serving of that food. A reference database is used to establish the nutrient content of each food item. FFQ data are assumed to be representative of habitual intake and can be used to rank individuals according to intake. | A Food Frequency Questionnaire consists of a foodlist with a frequency response section for subjects to report how often each item was consumed over a specified period of time (in this case: one month). Data collection is therefore retrospective. From the answers given in a FFQ, nutrient intake can be estimated by calculations made with computerized software programs that multiply the reported frequency of each food item by the amount of nutrient in a serving of that food. A reference database is used to establish the nutrient content of each food item. FFQ data are assumed to be representative of habitual intake and can be used to rank individuals according to intake. | ||
- | LifeLines | + | Lifelines |
\\ | \\ | ||
Line 29: | Line 33: | ||
Preprocessing: | Preprocessing: | ||
- | * //Frequency of consumption:// | + | * //Frequency of consumption:// |
* //Food items eaten within a food group// are assigned a value according to the frequency of their consumption: | * //Food items eaten within a food group// are assigned a value according to the frequency of their consumption: | ||
* // | * // | ||
Line 44: | Line 48: | ||
The WUR researchers listed the following points of attention: | The WUR researchers listed the following points of attention: | ||
* **Extreme values have not been corrected: | * **Extreme values have not been corrected: | ||
- | * **Not all missing values are treated equally:** When __frequency of consumption__ is missing the whole question cannot be interpreted and data for this food are not included in the calculations of total nutrient intake. Resulting in the possibility of underestimation of total daily intake of some nutrients for this participants. When __the number of servings and/or the food items consumed__ are missing, standard answers are used for calculations (according to the Dutch National Food Consumption Survey 1998). Because these are standard answers established for the whole population, the consumption of the food in grams per day and the intake of certain nutrients may be over- or underestmiated. | + | * **Not all missing values are treated equally:** When __frequency of consumption__ is missing, the whole question cannot be interpreted and data for this food are not included in the calculations of total nutrient intake. Resulting in the possibility of underestimation of total daily intake of some nutrients for this participants. When __the number of servings and/or the food items consumed__ are missing, standard answers are used for calculations (according to the Dutch National Food Consumption Survey 1998). Because these are standard answers established for the whole population, the consumption of the food in grams per day and the intake of certain nutrients may be over- or underestmiated. |
\\ | \\ | ||
Line 54: | Line 58: | ||
===== Variables ===== | ===== Variables ===== | ||
Below the total intake per person per day for different energy/ | Below the total intake per person per day for different energy/ | ||
- | | **Questions | + | | **Label English** |
| total added sugar delivered by all food items in g/day (ffq heart) | | total added sugar delivered by all food items in g/day (ffq heart) | ||
| total alcohol intake in g/day (ffq heart) | | total alcohol intake in g/day (ffq heart) | ||
Line 102: | Line 106: | ||
| total vitamin c intake in mg/day (ffq heart + petals) | | total vitamin c intake in mg/day (ffq heart + petals) | ||
| total vitamin e intake in mg/day (ffq heart + petals) | | total vitamin e intake in mg/day (ffq heart + petals) | ||
+ | | total haem iron intake in mg/day (ffq heart + petals) | ||
+ | | total non-haem iron intake in mg/day (ffq heart + petals) | ||
+ | | total iron intake in mg/day (ffq heart + petals) | ||
* All FFQ sum scores included as assessment ' | * All FFQ sum scores included as assessment ' |
ffq_sum_scores.1627568627.txt.gz · Last modified: (external edit)